click images for larger view
Now the wraps are off. Avert your eyes.Yes, as dedicated reader BW Chicago has noted, I actually used the phrase, "The drawings point to a definite improvement." And no, I don't remember what I was high on that day. I guess the drawings looked clean.
What was immediately apparent, even from the drawings, is that the plan was to trash Pond and Pond's original design, with its charming monumental entrance and rounded pediments above three second-story windows reflecting parallel features above the windows of the penultimate floor.
What was not so completely apparent is how God-awful the entire installation would be It, in fact, varies substantially from the drawing posted on the site. On the plus side, much of the clumsy detailing was left unrealized. On the down side, where the drawing shows rounded pediments above the second story windows, what we actually get is a series of blocky, ugly black rectangles. A thin, dark string course simply breaks off and disappears above the windows, where I guess the chunky rectangles above are supposed to take its place. Strangely enough, the entrance is also slightly different, with a small arched accent added above it. If it was an attempt to reference Pond and Pond's pediments above, it's pathetic. The new facing is the color and visual consistency of green vomit.
No doubt the landlord is overjoyed.
Lovely. Who is the Architect?
ReplyDeleteThe name on the drawings was Haylock Design of Gurnee.
ReplyDeleteWhat is the new ground level exterior finish? Is that Dryvit/EIFS? ecch!
ReplyDeleteUnbelievable. The architects and owner should be pilloried.
ReplyDeleteI am glad you wrote about this. This is one of my favorite buildings and I forgot that they were doing this work. Recently I was walking by the building feeling vaguely sick and thinking There was something very wrong. Your before images remind me of what was there before.
ReplyDeleteWhat kind of lame thinking goes into a project like this?
By the way D = D Steele - ugh!
ReplyDeleteWhat a disaster!
ReplyDeleteRob
The original 1st and 2nd floor cladding was red sandstone. Difficult to repair (expensive), but not impossible.
ReplyDeleteWhat's the source for Pond & Pond? I have a source that the original architect was Robert Skilleter Smith.
ReplyDeleteGiving the address as "55-60" does not inspire confidence.
https://books.google.com/books?id=gYLlF61yeYEC&pg=PA167&lpg=PA167&dq=Amanda+Apartments+%22Pond+%26+Pond%22&source=bl&ots=6AZdqoPrC9&sig=rLHbwz1KDewcC944w6oklPSu6Ts&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CB4Q6AEwAGoVChMImMqhzqOQxwIVTxCSCh3hlA_S#v=onepage&q=Amanda%20Apartments%20%22Pond%20%26%20Pond%22&f=false
ReplyDeletehttp://collections.carli.illinois.edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/uic_bru/id/1317
ReplyDelete